The --fix
option on the command line can automatically fix some of the problems reported by this rule.
If a loop contains no nested loops or switches, labeling the loop is unnecessary.
A: while (a) {
break A;
}
You can achieve the same result by removing the label and using break
or continue
without a label. Probably those labels would confuse developers because they expect labels to jump to further.
This rule is aimed at eliminating unnecessary labels.
Examples of incorrect code for this rule:
/*eslint no-extra-label: "error"*/
A: while (a) {
break A;
}
B: for (let i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
break B;
}
C: switch (a) {
case 0:
break C;
}
Examples of correct code for this rule:
/*eslint no-extra-label: "error"*/
while (a) {
break;
}
for (let i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
break;
}
switch (a) {
case 0:
break;
}
A: {
break A;
}
B: while (a) {
while (b) {
break B;
}
}
C: switch (a) {
case 0:
while (b) {
break C;
}
break;
}
If you don't want to be notified about usage of labels, then it's safe to disable this rule.
This rule was introduced in ESLint 2.0.0-rc.0.
© JS Foundation and other contributors
Licensed under the MIT License.
https://eslint.org/docs/rules/no-extra-label